Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 4 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
NUR 660 Week 5 Teaching Plan Rubric
NUR 660 Week 5 Teaching Plan Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Class Description and Learning Objectives
threshold: pts
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
All areas addressed in detail. Objectives are measurable and correctly match the learning domain and Bloom's taxonomy.
9 to >6.0 pts
Satisfactory
All areas are addressed. Most objectives are measurable and correctly match either the learning domain or Bloom's taxonomy.
6 to >0 pts
Need Some Improvement
Objectives were missing or some were not measurable; the domain/taxonomy is inaccurate.
pts
10 pts
--
Content Outline and Teaching/Learning Activities
threshold: pts
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Content outline and learning activities align accurately with the objectives. Activities are varied and engaging.
9 to >6.0 pts
Satisfactory
Content outline and learning activities mostly align with the objectives. Activities are varied and somewhat engaging.
6 to >0 pts
Need Some Improvement
Content outline and learning activities do not align well with the objectives. Activities are not varied or engaging.
pts
10 pts
--
Application of Theory to Practice
threshold: pts
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Provides well documented rationales for the class activities. Thoroughtly and accurately applies learning theory.
9 to >6.0 pts
Satisfactory
Provides some documentation to support rationales for the class activities. Accurately applies learning theory.
6 to >0 pts
Need Some Improvement
Documentation or application of learning theory is lacking in depth or is inaccurate.
pts
10 pts
--
Application of Learning Styles, Cultural Relevancy, and Evaluation
threshold: pts
10 to >9.0 pts
Excellent
Thoroughtly explains how learning styles, Kolb's model, and cultural relevance are incorporated. Describes evaluation methods.
9 to >6.0 pts
Satisfactory
Adequately explains how learning styles, Kolb's model, and cultural relevance are incorporated. Describes evaluation methods.
6 to >0 pts
Need Some Improvement
Could be addressed in more depth; Some components do not meet expectations or are missing.
pts
10 pts
--
Writing Mechanics/Format
threshold: pts
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
Paper is coherently organized with few spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is clear and concise.
4 to >2.0 pts
Satisfactory
Paper is generally well organized with some spelling or grammatical errors. Writing is mostly clear but may lack conciseness.
2 to >0 pts
Need Some Improvement
Paper is poorly organized and difficult to read another. Excessive spelling and/or grammatical errors.
pts
5 pts
--
APA Format
threshold: pts
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent
APA used with 1-2 unique errors in APA format, in-text citations, or reference page. Has the correct number and type of references.
4 to >2.0 pts
Satisfactory
APA used with 3-4 unique errors noted. Has less the the required number or type of sources.
2 to >0 pts
Need Some Improvement
APA used with 5 or more unique errors noted.
pts
5 pts
--
Total Points: 50 out of 50